Before Tuesday: Where Do You Sit in ACT Championship History?

FAST Running - Matt Walters

On Tuesday, another group of young ACT athletes will walk onto the track for the 2026 ACT 13 Years and Over Track and Field Championships.

For most, the immediate questions will be about the present. What lane am I in? Who am I racing? Can I make the final? Can I run a personal best? Can I get a placing?

There is another question that becomes much more interesting when more than a decade of results are placed alongside one another.

Where would your performance sit in the history of this championship?

FAST has gone back through the published ACT Championship results and compiled the eight fastest performances we could identify across each age group in the girls’ and boys’ 100m and 200m. The tables are now available below, and they make for fascinating reading ahead of the 2026 Championships.

Some names appear once. Others return year after year as an athlete develops. Some of the young people on these lists went on to achieve considerably more in athletics. Others followed entirely different paths.

That is perhaps what makes looking backwards so interesting just before another championship begins.

The Names Behind the Numbers

A historical ranking can initially look like a collection of names and decimal points. Spend a little longer with these lists, however, and individual athletic journeys begin to appear.

Take Eddie Nketia.

His name sits at the top of several of the historical boys’ lists. At 13, he ran 24.38 for 200m. A year later he produced 23.31. At 15, he ran 11.06 and 22.40. At 16, the 100m had fallen to 10.88.

Those performances were impressive at the time, but nobody looking at a school championship result could know precisely where the journey would eventually lead.

Eddie went on to become a senior national champion and international athlete. Athletics New Zealand records him as having run 10.08 for 100m in 2022, then a New Zealand national record.  

In 2025 he ran 20.24 for 200m in the United States.  

Suddenly, that 24.38 beside the name of a 13-year-old looks a little different.

Not because 24.38 predicted everything that followed. It didn’t.

It matters because we now have the privilege of knowing the next chapters.

Sometimes the Story Is Happening Right Now

Other names on these lists don’t require us to look very far into the past.

Aisha Shave (Todd, Vergano) has left an extraordinary sequence through the girls’ rankings. Her name appears at 13, 14, 15 and 16, including 12.12 at 14 and 25.09 over 200m in the same age group.

Her development continued well beyond those championship performances. World Athletics now lists Shave with legal personal bests of 11.92 for 100m and 24.04 for 200m, with an all-conditions 11.84 also appearing on her profile.  

Then there is Tobias Drummond-Templeton (Vergano), whose progression can almost be followed down the boys’ tables. He appears at 14, moves to 22.96 for 200m at 15, 21.87 at 16 and 21.91 at 17. His 17-year-old 100m performance of 10.86 also leads that historical age-group list.

World Athletics records a 21.29 legal 200m personal best from 2025, alongside a 10.65 legal 100m best.  

These aren’t names from some distant era of ACT athletics. They are young athletes whose stories are still developing.

And Some Names Are Very Familiar to FAST

For the FAST community, there are plenty of moments of recognition in the lists.

Daniel Nwaobi first appears among the leading 13-year-old 200m performances with 25.62 in 2022. At 14, he appears again with 11.53 and 23.73. At 15, it becomes 11.41 and 23.11. At 16, he produced 10.89 and 22.59.

The FAST athletes who train beside Daniel today know a considerably faster athlete.

That is part of the fun of historical results. We normally look at an athlete’s current personal best and think forward: How much faster can they become?

Historical results allow us to reverse the question.

How did they get here?

Siena Towndrow, Cecilia Ador, Simeon Omosigho, Sam Blood and Matthew Walters are among the other familiar FAST names appearing through the historical lists.

For today’s younger FAST athletes, those aren’t simply names sitting in an archive. Some are athletes they have trained beside, watched compete or heard coaches talk about.

And on Tuesday, another set of performances will be added to the story.

What Would Your Time Have Done?

Perhaps the most enjoyable way to explore the tables is also the simplest.

Find your age.

Find your event.

Then find your personal best.

A 13-year-old boy running 12.20 for 100m, for example, can see immediately that the performance belongs in some pretty impressive historical company. A 14-year-old girl approaching 13 seconds can see the athletes who have occupied that territory before her. A 16-year-old boy can discover just how demanding the historical 100m list becomes when 11.25 only gets you to seventh.

For current athletes, that can provide context that a single championship result rarely gives.

It also creates something to chase.

The athlete sitting eighth on one of these lists has established a line. Someone racing on Tuesday may cross it.

The athlete currently sitting first has established another.

Someone, eventually, may cross that too.

But Don’t Mistake a Ranking for a Prediction

There is an important qualification to all of this.

FAST has spent considerable time studying the development of young ACT athletes through our ACT Development Study, and the historical evidence continues to reinforce something coaches and parents need to remember.

Junior performance matters.

It just isn’t destiny.

Being among the fastest 13-year-olds in ACT history is an achievement worth celebrating. It does not guarantee that athlete will become an elite senior sprinter. Equally, failing to appear anywhere on these lists at 13 does not tell us that an athlete cannot eventually become very good.

Growth and maturation occur at different times. Young people change sports. Coaching environments change. Motivation changes. Injuries happen. Some athletes fall in love with athletics later than others.

The tables tell us what happened.

They don’t tell us what has to happen next.

That distinction is important, particularly when the people represented by these performances were children when many of the results were recorded.

On Tuesday, Someone Writes the Next Line

That is why publishing these rankings immediately before the 2026 Championships feels particularly appropriate.

Tuesday’s athletes aren’t just racing the names beside them on a start list. Without necessarily knowing it, they are adding another layer to a championship history that stretches back through athletes who stood in exactly the same position.

Some will run a personal best.

Some will win medals.

Some may find their way into these Top Eight lists.

And perhaps somewhere on Tuesday’s start line will be an athlete whose name we will look back on very differently ten years from now.

We can’t know.

That’s the wonderful thing about junior sport.

So before the gun goes on Tuesday, take a look through the historical performances below. Find your age. Find your event. Look for the athletes you recognise.

Then ask the obvious question:

Where do you sit?

And for those competing this week, there is an even better one:

Where will you sit after Tuesday?

FAST Performance | Centre of Running Excellence

Real data. Better understanding. Better coaching.

Running Excellence grows. 🖤❤️

100m

13 years

Rank13 yearsTimeYear
1Nina Schuster12.822011
2Eloise Millington12.912014
=3Aisha Shave12.932022
=3Tarcia Whitesands*12.932016
5Keely Small13.062014
6Lillian Van Ewyk13.092011
=7Olivia Jose13.15 (+1.7)2024
=7Chloe Smith13.15 NWI2019

14 years

Rank14 yearsTimeYear
1Aisha Shave12.122023
2Amelia Mutton12.72 (+2.0)2024
3Abbie Bailey*12.792018
4Annamaria Leszczynska12.802014
5Olivia Jose12.85 (+1.5)2025
6Lillian Van Ewyk12.872012
7Nina Schuster12.922012
8Siena Towndrow12.952022

15 years

Rank15 yearsTimeYear
1Aisha Shave12.35 (+1.5)2024
2Eloise Millington*12.682016
3Siena Towndrow12.782023
4Dana-Louise Deklin12.792014
5Amelia Mutton12.87 (−0.9)2025
6Lara Sinclair12.942012
7Grace Brennan12.952014
8Charlotte Morgan12.982023

16 years

Rank16 yearsTimeYear
1Aisha Shave12.24 (+0.4)2025
2Sierra Jacques12.442023
3Claire De Sallis*12.552016
4Annabel Roden12.602011
5Cecilia Ador12.67 (+0.4)2025
6Erin Prince12.712011
7Siena Towndrow12.78 (+2.8)2024
8Annabel Laing12.982014

17 years

Rank17 yearsTimeYear
1Grace Brennan*12.532017
2Chloe Kong12.65 (+0.6)2025
3Erin Prince12.702012
4Elise Simpson12.782023
5Sienna Towndrow12.90 (+0.6)2025
6Lotte Latukefu13.002023
7Holly Dudziak13.102023
8Japneet Badwal13.31 (+0.6)2025

18-19 years

Rank18–19/20TimeYear
1Clare De Salis*12.612018
2Inemami Ajulo12.852022
3Winnie Herring13.14 (+1.2)2025
4Olivia McHugh13.202023
5Kody-Leigh Hirst13.282012
6Catherine Culvenor13.48 (−0.2)2010
7Sophie Imhoff13.56 (+1.2)2025
8Grace Tosic13.592011

Boys

13 Years

Rank13 yearsTimeYear
1Sioeli Hifo11.54 (+2.3)2024
2Maxwell Berry11.99 NWI2019
3Jacob Patmore12.042011
4Simeon Omosigho12.092023
5Josh Phongkhan12.10 NWI2019
6Riley Kingston12.11 (−0.3)2009
7Anton Kafadar12.14 (+1.1)2025
8Jacob Church12.232014

14 Years

Rank14 yearsTimeYear
1Sioeli Hifo11.20 (+0.8)2025
2Edward Osei-Nketia*11.332015
3Daniel Nwaobi11.532023
4Calvin Butler11.642011
5Luke Twynham11.68 (+1.7)2009
6Jacob Patmore11.712012
7Robert Ness11.772023
8Simeon Omosigho11.78 (+0.3)2024

15 Years

Rank15 yearsTimeYear
1Edward Osei-Nketia*11.062016
2Tobias Drummond-Templeton11.232023
3Lucas Ryan11.282023
=4Aydin Ayan11.412023
=4Daniel Nwaobi11.41 (+1.4)2024
6Joshua Smith11.45 (+1.4)2024
7J. Adjei-Ameyaw11.462023
8Calvin Butler11.522012

16 Years

Rank16 yearsTimeYear
1Edward Osei-Nketia*10.882017
=2Tobias Drummond-Templeton10.89 (+2.3)2024
=2Daniel Nwaobi10.89 (+3.8)2025
=4Nicholas Vecchi11.172011
=4Max Juric11.172023
6Sam Blood11.21 (+3.8)2025
7Maxwell Berry11.252022
8Joshua Lobo11.35 (+2.3)2024

17 Years

Rank17 yearsTimeYear
1Tobias Drummond-Templeton10.86 (+0.5)2025
2Ryan Knight10.91 (+3.2)2024
3Maxwell Berry11.002023
4Matthew Walters*11.212016
5Cameron Nicholls11.282012
=6Nicholas Vecchi11.292012
=6Lucas Ryan11.29 (+0.5)2025
8Noah Geleris11.392014

18-19 Years

Rank18–19/20TimeYear
1Ryan Knight11.04 (+1.0)2025
2Thomas Agnew*11.082017
3Rory Forbes11.092023
4D. Neisler-McKeon11.352022
5Ethan Gould11.42 (−2.7)2009
6Harry Anderson11.502023
7Van Scheppingen11.512023
8Daniel Luton11.662011

200m

Girls

13 Years

Rank13 yearsTimeYear
1Abbie Bailey*25.982017
2Eloise Millington26.742014
3Aisha Shave27.022022
4Chioma Enyi27.302014
5Ruby White27.352014
6Tahli Robertson27.502023
7Ava Pitt28.062023
8Amelie Griffiths28.202023

14 Years

Rank14 yearsTimeYear
1Aisha Shave25.092023
2Lillian Van Ewyk25.872012
3Annamaria Leszczynska26.012014
4Imogen Laing26.382014
=4Annabel Laing26.382012
6Siena Towndrow26.762022
7Chloe Kong27.012022
8Heidi Davidson27.472023

15 Years

Rank15 yearsTimeYear
1Aisha Shave25.342024
2Eloise Millington*25.592016
3Dana-Louise Deklin26.152014
4Siena Towndrow26.412023
5Sierra Jaques26.612022
6Alison McKinlay26.612012
7Lara Sinclair26.822012
8Josie Priddle26.882022

16 Years

Rank16 yearsTimeYear
1Aisha Shave25.14 (+0.3)2025
2Sierra Jacques25.732023
3Annabel Laing25.852014
4Siena Towndrow26.072024
5Cecilia Ador26.48 (+0.3)2025
6Elise Simpson26.602022
7Lillian Van Ewyk26.592014
8Winnie Herring26.952023

17 Years

Rank17 yearsTimeYear
1Alesha Bennetts25.112022
2Grace Brennan*25.512016
3Elise Simpson25.992023
4Holly Dudziak26.452023
5Chloe Kong26.65 (−0.4)2025
6Ariadne Stergio26.802022
7Hannah Leitch26.972023
8Japneet Badwal27.06 (−0.4)2025

18-19 Years

Rank18–19/20TimeYear
1Alesha Bennetts25.392023
2Inemami Ajulo25.702022
3Annabel Laing*25.752016
4Hannah Leitch27.242024
5Bridget Reilly27.392014
6Winnie Herring27.612025
7Sophie Imhoff28.312025
8Olivia McHugh28.352023

Boy

13 Years

Rank13 yearsTimeYear
1Sioeli Hifo23.87 (−0.3)2024
2Edward Osei-Nketia*24.382014
3Simeon Omosigho24.952023
4Jacob Church25.332014
5Sebastian Neale25.382023
6Finn Braithwaite25.582023
7Daniel Nwaobi25.622022
8Maxwell Berry25.70 NWI2019

14 Years

Rank14 yearsTimeYear
1Edward Osei-Nketia*23.312015
2Daniel Nwaobi23.732023
3Calvin Butler23.872011
4Joshua Smith23.962023
5Robert Ness24.482023
6Tobias Drummond-Templeton24.502022
7Brayden Worth24.682023
8Thomas Penfold24.83 NWI2019

15 Years

Rank15 yearsTimeYear
1Edward Osei-Nketia*22.402016
2Tobias Drummond-Templeton22.962023
3Aydin Ayan22.992023
=4Daniel Nwaobi23.11 (−0.1)2024
=4Joshua Smith23.11 (−0.1)2024
6Allen Kane23.402014
=7Liam Watson23.432011
=7Lucas Ryan23.432023

16 Years

Rank16 yearsTimeYear
1Tobias Drummond-Templeton21.872024
2Edward Osei-Nketia*22.472017
=3Daniel Nwaobi22.59 (−0.5)2025
=3Max Juric22.592023
5Nicholas Vecchi22.622011
=6Maxwell Berry22.882022
=6Cameron Nicholls22.882011
8Ryan Knight23.232023

17 Years

Rank17 yearsTimeYear
1Tobias Drummond-Templeton21.912025
2Maxwell Berry22.312023
3Matthew Walters*22.522016
4Aydin Ayan22.852025
5Alexander Keen23.002023
6Lucas Ryan23.102025
7Michael Bornholt23.612011
8Yusuf Kamara23.692011

18-19 Years

Rank18–19/20TimeYear
1Rory Forbes22.792023
2Sebastian Laws23.392022
3D. Neisler-McKeon23.412022
4Marc Tremopoulos23.452025
5van Scheppingen23.572023
6Jordan Schultz*23.772017
7Oliver Luppi24.162025
=8Jake Rawlins24.312022
=8Courtney Kawaley24.312025

Comments are closed